Bodies do not produce sensations, but complexes of elements (complexes of sensations) make up bodies.
A colour is a physical object as soon as we consider its dependence, for instance, upon its luminous source, upon other colours, upon temperatures, upon spaces, and so forth.
Thus the great gulf between physical and psychological research persists only when we acquiesce in our habitual stereotyped conceptions.
Personally, people know themselves very poorly.
The philosophical point of view of the average man - if that term may be applied to his naive realism - has a claim to the highest consideration.
Ordinarily pleasure and pain are regarded as different from sensations.
The ego is as little absolutely permanent as are bodies.
In fact, sensations of pleasure and pain, however faint they may be, really constitute an essential part of the content of all so-called emotions.
Physics is experience, arranged in economical order.
In the long run we shall not be able to close our eyes to this simple truth, which is the immediate outcome of psychological analysis.
Without renouncing the support of physics, it is possible for the physiology of the senses, not only to pursue its own course of development, but also to afford to physical science itself powerful assistance.
The very gradual character of the changes of the body also contributes to the stability of the ego, but in a much less degree than people imagine.
The plain man is familiar with blindness and deafness, and knows from his everyday experience that the look of things is influenced by his senses; but it never occurs to him to regard the whole world as the creation of his senses.
Man is pre-eminently endowed with the power of voluntarily and consciously determining his own point of view.
The fact is, every thinker, every philosopher, the moment he is forced to abandon his one-sided intellectual occupation by practical necessity, immediately returns to the general point of view of mankind.
The biological task of science is to provide the fully developed human individual with as perfect a means of orientating himself as possible. No other scientific ideal can be realised, and any other must be meaningless.
When I recall today my early youth, I should take the boy that I then was, with the exception of a few individual features, for a different person, were it not for the existence of the chain of memories.
Similarly, many a young man, hearing for the first time of the refraction of stellar light, has thought that doubt was cast on the whole of astronomy, whereas nothing is required but an easily effected and unimportant correction to put everything right again.
If our dreams were more regular, more connected, more stable, they would also have more practical importance for us.
The task which we have set ourselves is simply to show why and for what purpose we hold that standpoint during most of our lives, and why and for what purpose we are provisionally obliged to abandon it.
My table is now brightly, now dimly lighted. Its temperature varies. It may receive an ink stain. One of its legs may be broken. It may be repaired, polished, and replaced part by part. But, for me, it remains the table at which I daily write.
A movement that we will to execute is never more than a represented movement, and appears in a different domain from that of the executed movement, which always takes place when the image is vivid enough.
Science always has its origin in the adaptation of thought to some definite field of experience.
Thing, body, matter, are nothing apart from the combinations of the elements, - the colours, sounds, and so forth - nothing apart from their so-called attributes.
Many an article that I myself penned twenty years ago impresses me now as something quite foreign to myself.